This was yet another Scream Unseen so it's not something I had any intention of wasting one of my movie slots on, even if I had ones left over. I only knew it existed because there was a trailer for it at the previous Scream Unseen.
The concept here is that someone is taking scenes from the actual, original "Faces of Death" released in 1978 (thank you Wikipedia), recreating them, and posting them on social media. Since the movie had various and sundry "scenes" they translate well to the short video format used on YouTube, TikTok, etc.
The original movie was mostly fake with real footage from other sources, sometimes recreated for effect (thank you Wikipedia). I was of an age when I remember when this came out and yeah, it was a rite of passage in some respects. Mostly it was people going "ew" and watching other things. It wasn't nearly as pervasive as some try to make it. Of course it had its fan base but what gross movie doesn't?
The main character is a woman who's job is to review reported content on a social media site. It's obviously meant to be TikTok but that's to be expected. It shows her going through various and sundry videos, approving or denying based on content. Per policy she lets the gross and violent stuff through but has to remove the ones dealing with sex education. No heavy handed writing there. Nope.
They show her taking blue pills she keeps in a baggie in her pocket. It turns out she's got anxiety because her sister was killed while the two of them were filming what they wanted to be a viral video. They were on train tracks and trying to film themselves in front of the train until the very last minute. She got away, her sister slipped on the gravel and was under the train when it passed. The main character is recognized by people as Train Girl.
I let that one go. She's not in any way distinctive physically so there's no reason why people would continue to recognize her because of the short attention span these videos have. Unless maybe she's living in the same area and people know here that way? Didn't seem like it but I can assume.
When she sees a second one of the videos in the same format she gets concerned and talks to her supervisor/friend about it. She's reminded that it isn't her job to make the call, she needs to follow the rules, and that she's signed an NDA so she can't talk about it outside work. I would think potential murder trumps an NDA but what do I know?
The videos are just fake enough to make you question them. That's done well. There's a consistency in using red tape over the eyes of mannequins used in the shooting and also in the scenery. They show the comments pouring in on the videos as people debate if it's real or not and how much they enjoy the content.
We see the killer early on. He works at for a cellular phone company and uses admin access to dig into how to find an influencer he's obsessed with. She's actually a pretty harmless one as influencers go. Per her own content she just wanted to show makeup tips and then things got popular so now she feels that she needs to keep her followers happy. The killer tracks her down and kidnaps her.
The main character uses her roommates laptop because she's on an internet break. She does this to try to track down the creator of the potential snuff content. Using techniques that don't really exist she makes progress but wants/needs the original uploads to look at metadata. Yes. They use the buzzwords. She coerces her boss/friend out of the office while he's working overtime and uses his computer to copy over all the videos. She's still taking those blue pills and the movie makes a point of her tossing the bag on the desk instead of putting it in her pocket like she's done every other freaking time it's shown.
Long story short(er). She gets fired for the pills and because she can't let this situation go. She buys a laptop so she can do her own research because her roommate told her she was getting too involved and wouldn't let her use his anymore. She continues.
The killer kidnaps someone from a TV news station and his son, who happened to be home at the wrong time. They show the holding cages in the killer's basement with the influencer and the father-son duo. The father gets pulled out and used for the next video being shot. Literally.
I can't remember how the main character figures out who the killer is and where he lives. She tries talking to the police and gets brushed off. The killer sets up a honeytrap and gets the information on the main character so he can use her, killing her roommate in the process. She decides to go in on her own. Predictably she's caught and put into the empty cage. She uses a convenient self defense lipstick knife her roommate had to escape and she's able to get the influencer free to go with her. They break out while the killer hunts them but go out into the fenced back yard that has undeveloped land behind it.
The influencer gets shot (obviously no one in the subdivision cares about the sound of a high power rifle being fired repeatedly) and dragged back. The main character stays back to get evidence and snags the convenient external hard drive labeled FOD. When she runs away she gets away. The hospital finds ketamine in her system from when he knocked her out, the nurse lectures her, and gives her a bottle of Narcan.
The killer has brought the influencer back into the house and puts on his meek and mild clothing and persona when the main character brings the police over to check things out. He was smart enough to make his own 911 call about being stalked and describing the main character. The police believe him, the calm meek guy who said he's being stalked, over the almost hysterical main character saying there's dead bodies and people chained up in his basement. He was even clever enough to turn up the music so it drown out the sound of the still alive influencer moaning in the kitchen.
I'll wrap this up.
The main character goes back to have this out with the killer. On the Uber ride over there she's huffing the Narcan. She gets there, he drugs her again, and she goes with it. When she's in the filming room she pops up and they fight. She stabs him with the lipstick knife she brought in until she can get to other weapons. There's the mandatory "hide from the killer" scene. There's the mandatory extreme horror scene. There's a mandatory wrestle on the floor covered in blood. There's the mandatory bad guy monologue on how he's giving the people what they want. Surprise, she's wearing a button camera and has all of it on the memory card. As he's lying there, bleeding and cursing, she uploads it to social media.
End of movie.
I will say the concepts weren't bad. Using an old discredited horror/slasher/fake documentary as his inspiration the killer uses people's fascination with extreme content to kill people and get accolades. The prevalence of social media in young people's lives fuels this kind of thing, which isn't really wrong. It's more a commentary on that than on the killing itself, even though he uses prominent social media people as his victims.
What was bad was the story wrapping those concepts. Disbelief had to be stretched to the breaking point when it was the race between the killer and the main character, then the battle between the main character and the killer. Putting his confession on social media was a "cherry on top" kind of thing, since that's where he put his crimes.
She had to go back because the hard drive she took was hit with a bullet during her escape. There are ways to recover data, you know. The police can do that. But that wouldn't have worked with the plot.
This is also one of the increasingly popular non-endings that I'm seeing. Yes, the killer is seriously wounded and his confession is made public. But there's no conclusion. Just her sitting there covered in blood, laughing/crying that the upload finished and the comments start. Maybe they wanted to make the statement that the same public that adores you will turn on you in a heartbeat? I don't know.
The lipstick knife also bugs me. It's a pretty nice self-defense weapon. The top is real lipstick. Removed it's about an inch long curved blade. But it's not an attack weapon and wouldn't have caused near the damage they showed in the fight. It's like using a .22 gun for self-defense. It just pisses them off.